Send us a link

Subscribe to our newsletter

Decisions, Decisions

Decisions, Decisions

Journals are exploring new approaches to peer review in order to reduce bias, increase transparency and respond to author preferences. Funders are also getting involved.

The Readability of Scientific Texts Is Decreasing Over Time

The Readability of Scientific Texts Is Decreasing Over Time

Scientific abstracts have become less readable over the past 130 years, in part because recent texts include more general scientific jargon than older texts.

eLife Supports Development of Open Technology Stack for Publishing Reproducible Manuscripts Online

eLife Supports Development of Open Technology Stack for Publishing Reproducible Manuscripts Online

The Reproducible Document Stack will allow authors to submit their manuscripts in a format that includes embedded code blocks and computed outputs, and for publishers to preserve these assets in an enhanced version of the published online article.

Science Beam - Using Computer Vision to Extract PDF Data

Science Beam - Using Computer Vision to Extract PDF Data

A new project to convert PDF to XML with high accuracy by complementing existing tools with computer vision technology.

ELife Joins Substance Consortium to Support Development of Open-Source Online Content-Editing Tools

ELife Joins Substance Consortium to Support Development of Open-Source Online Content-Editing Tools

By joining the consortium, eLife will support the introduction of innovative new tools to help expand the current online open scholarly infrastructure.

Availability of Open Reference Data Nears 50% as Major Societies and Influential Publishers Endorse the Initiative for Open Citations

Availability of Open Reference Data Nears 50% as Major Societies and Influential Publishers Endorse the Initiative for Open Citations

In the three months following the Initiative for Open Citations' launch, the percentage of articles with open reference data has moved from 40% to over 45%.

ScienceFair - a New Desktop Science Library

ScienceFair - a New Desktop Science Library

A new way to access and consume science from your desktop using peer-to-peer technology.

Inside eLife: Forking Software Used in ELife Papers to GitHub

Inside eLife: Forking Software Used in ELife Papers to GitHub

New eLife's GitHub account to track new software or a new algorithm when they are central to an article and to make sure that the right version of the code that was used within an article persists.

Setting your Cites on Open

Setting your Cites on Open

The Initiative for Open Citations (I4OC) was launched on April 6th, 2017. Over the course of about six months, the initiative has made a large fraction of the citation data that link all scholarship freely available.

Gender Bias in Scholarly Peer Review

Gender Bias in Scholarly Peer Review

Gender-bias in peer reviewing might persist even when gender-equity is reached because both male and female editors operate with a same-gender preference whose characteristics differ by editor-gender.

Publication Bias and the Canonization of False Facts

Publication Bias and the Canonization of False Facts

Publication bias, in which positive results are preferentially reported by authors and published by journals, can restrict the visibility of evidence against false claims and allow such claims to be canonized inappropriately as facts.

eLife Appoints New Head of Technology to Lead Open-Source Tool Development

eLife Appoints New Head of Technology to Lead Open-Source Tool Development

eLife has appointed Paul Shannon as its new Head of Technology to oversee the development of tools and software in support of science communication.

What it costs to publish in eLife

What it costs to publish in eLife

We present a deeper view of our 2015 financials, covering publishing and non-publishing expenses. As part of our ambition to change how science publishing works, especially among highly selective journals, we hope that being transparent about our costs will help to set a future course for research communication that is efficient and sustainable.

How open science helps researchers succeed

How open science helps researchers succeed

A literature review demonstrating that open research is associated with increases in citations, media attention, potential collaborators, job opportunities, and funding opportunities.

Avoiding a lost generation of scientists

Avoiding a lost generation of scientists

By sharing their experiences, early-career scientists can help to make the case for increased government funding for researchers.

In numbers we trust?

In numbers we trust?

Scientists go to great lengths to ensure that data are collected and analysed properly, so why do they apply different standards to data about the number of times research papers have been cited and viewed?